People are acting like we've never been given vaccinations before. Before you go to school as a kid. You have to get school shots. When youre 12 you have to get a tetanus shot. But in the 50s it was a polio shot. I'm not saying I'm for the vaccine. But what is the difference?
This is your first post on this site?
Hmm... welcome.
Let's go:
People are acting like we've never been given vaccinations before...
From my perspective, people are acting like the drug companies manufacturing this new cv vax aren't guilty of
fraud--> fraudulent data, marketing, etc., to the tune of Billion dollar payouts. **Not limited to vaccines!** Not limited to one company! **
Are you unaware of these proceedings? They are public record on justice.gov and ncbi.gov. Pfizer has been labeled a habitual offender by the latter... but they are all habitual offenders. Have a google-- there is significant, legitimate cause for concern, here.
you have to get a tetanus shot.
Tetanus treatment began in 1890. The latest version--> 1992. 130 years / 30 years (respectively) to determine safety v. 30 days, with the brand spanking new, never before used vehicle of delivery, spike protein introducing, cv m RNA vax.
There is a
massive difference between this concoction and some of the other time-tested treatments you mentioned. It should be noted, however, some of the existing vax rounds are still under scrutiny-- as they should be.
This is a tiny snapshot (which I've posted multiple times, and I'm sure everyone is sick of it) of a much larger problem.
And even if the speculations are true. . . how are we going to stop it?
We aren't, if intelligent people continue to rationalize the situation. Just saying.