COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

rainerann

Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
4,550
Is it 5g, like the flu, or nonexistent frank? Did you finally make up your mind and pick one? Until you pick one, don’t talk about being ignorant. The only one you end up talking about is yourself.
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Excerpt below from "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg (p. 100-105), about the testing done during the "Spanish flu":-

The Spanish influenza apparently originated in the United States in early 1918, seemed to spread around the world on Navy
ships, and first appeared on board those ships and in seaports and Naval stations. The largest early outbreak, laying low about 400
people, occurred in February in the Naval Radio School at Cambridge, Massachusetts.8 In March, influenza spread to Army
camps where the Signal Corps was being trained in the use of the wireless: 1,127 men contracted influenza in Camp Funston, in
Kansas, and 2,900 men in the Oglethorpe camps in Georgia. In late March and April, the disease spread to the civilian population, and around the world.

Mild at first, the epidemic exploded with death in September, everywhere in the world at once. Waves of mortality traveled with astonishing speed over the global ocean of humanity, again and again until their force was finally spent three years later.

Its victims were often sick repeatedly for months at a time. One of the things that puzzled doctors the most was all of the
bleeding. Ten to fifteen percent of flu patients seen in private practice,9 and up to forty percent of flu patients in the Navy10
suffered from nosebleeds, doctors sometimes describing the blood as “gushing” from the nostrils.11 Others bled from their
gums, ears, skin, stomach, intestines, uterus, or kidneys, the most common and rapid route to death being hemorrhage in the lungs:
flu victims drowned in their own blood. Autopsies revealed that as many as one-third of fatal cases had also hemorrhaged into
their brain,12 and occasionally a patient appeared to be recovering from respiratory symptoms only to die of a brain hemorrhage.

“The regularity with which these various hemorrhages appeared suggested the possibility of there being a change in the blood itself,” wrote Drs. Arthur Erskine and B. L. Knight of Cedar Rapids, Iowa in late 1918. So they tested the blood from a large number of patients with influenza and pneumonia. “In every case tested without a single exception,” they wrote, “the coagulability of the blood was lessened, the increase in time required for coagulation varying from two and one-half to eight minutes more than normal. Blood was tested as early as the second day of infection, and as late as the twentieth day of convalescence from pneumonia, with the same results… Several local physicians also tested blood from their patients, and, while our records are at this time necessarily incomplete, we have yet to receive a report of a case in which the time of coagulation was not prolonged.”

This is consistent not with any respiratory virus, but with what has been known about electricity ever since Gerhard did the first experiment on human blood in 1779. It is consistent with what is known about the effects of radio waves on blood coagulation.13 Erskine and Knight saved their patients not by fighting infection, but by giving them large doses of calcium lactate to facilitate blood clotting.

Another astonishing fact that makes no sense if this pandemic was infectious, but that makes good sense if it was caused by radio waves, is that instead of striking down the old and the infirm like most diseases, this one killed mostly healthy, vigorous young people between the ages of eighteen and forty—just as the previous pandemic had done, with a little less vehemence, in 1889. This, as we saw in chapter 5, is the same as the predominant age range for neurasthenia, the chronic form of electrical illness. Two-thirds of all influenza deaths were in this age range.14 Elderly patients were rare.15 One doctor in Switzerland wrote that he “knew of no case in an infant and no severe case in persons over 50,” but that “one robust person showed the first symptoms at 4 p.m. and died before 10 the next morning.”16 A reporter in Paris went so far as to say that “only persons between 15 and 40 years of age are affected.”17

The prognosis was better if you were in poor physical condition. If you were undernourished, physically handicapped, anemic, or tuberculous, you were much less likely to get the flu and much less likely to die from it if you did.18 This was such a common observation that Dr. D. B. Armstrong wrote a provocative article, published in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, titled “Influenza: Is it a Hazard to Be Healthy?” Doctors were seriously discussing whether they were actually giving their patients a death sentence by advising them to keep fit!

The flu was reported to be even more fatal for pregnant women.

A further peculiarity that had doctors scratching their heads was that in most cases, after the patients’ temperature had returned to normal, their pulse rate fell below 60 and remained there for a number of days. In more serious cases the pulse rate fell to between 36 and 48, an indication of heart block.19 This too is puzzling for a respiratory virus, but will make sense when we learn about radio wave sickness.

Patients also regularly lost some of their hair two to three months after recovering from the flu. According to Samuel Ayres, a dermatologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, this was an almost daily occurrence, most of these patients being young women. This is not an expected after-effect of respiratory viruses either, but hair loss has been widely reported from exposure to radio waves.20

Yet another puzzling observation was that so few patients in 1918 had sore throats, runny noses, or other initial respiratory symptoms.21 But neurological symptoms, just as in the pandemic of 1889, were rampant, even in mild cases. They ranged from
insomnia, stupor, dulled perceptions, unusually heightened perceptions, tingling, itching, and impairment of hearing to
weakness or partial paralysis of the palate, eyelids, eyes, and various other muscles.22 The famous Karl Menninger reported on
100 cases of psychosis triggered by influenza, including 35 of schizophrenia, that he saw during a three-month period.23

Although the infectious nature of this illness was widely assumed, masks, quarantines, and isolation were all without effect.24 Even in an isolated country like Iceland the flu spread universally, in spite of the quarantining of its victims.25

The disease seemed to spread impossibly fast. “There is no reason to suppose that it traveled more rapidly than persons
could travel [but] it has appeared to do so,” wrote Dr. George A. Soper, Major in the United States Army.26

But most revealing of all were the various heroic attempts to prove the infectious nature of this disease, using volunteers. All these attempts, made in November and December 1918 and in February and March 1919, failed. One medical team in Boston, working for the United States Public Health Service, tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five.

Their efforts were impressive and make entertaining reading:We collected the material and mucous secretions of the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi from cases of the disease and transferred this to our volunteers. We always obtained this material in the same way. The patient with fever, in bed, had a large, shallow, traylike arrangement before him or her, and we washed out one nostril with some sterile salt solutions, using perhaps 5 c.c., which is allowed to run into the tray; and that nostril is blown vigorously into the tray. This is repeated with the other nostril. The patient then gargles with some of the solution.

Next we obtain some bronchial mucus through coughing, and then we swab the mucous surface of each nares and also the mucous surface of the throat… Each one of the volunteers…received 6 c.c. of the mixed stuff that I have described. They received it into each nostril; received it in the throat, and on the eye; and when you think that 6 c.c. in all was used, you will understand that some of it was swallowed. NONE OF THEM TOOK SICK.

In a further experiment with new volunteers and donors, the salt solution was eliminated, and with cotton swabs, the material was transferred directly from nose to nose and from throat to throat, using donors in the first, second, or third day of the disease. “None of these volunteers who received the material thus directly transferred from cases took sick in any way… All of the volunteers received at least two, and some of them three ‘shots’ as they expressed it.”

In a further experiment 20 c.c. of blood from each of five sick donors were mixed and injected into each volunteer. NONE OF THEM TOOK SICK IN ANY WAY.

“Then we collected a lot of mucous material from the upper respiratory tract, and filtered it through Mandler filters. This filtrate was injected into ten volunteers, each one receiving 3.5 c.c. subcutaneously, and
NONE OF THESE TOOK SICK IN ANY WAY.”

Then a further attempt was made to transfer the disease “in the natural way,” using fresh volunteers and donors: “The volunteer was led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat down alongside the bed of the patients. They shook hands, and by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of the five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out… After they had done this for five times, the patient coughed directly into the face of the volunteer, face to face, five different times… [Then] he moved to the next patient whom we had selected, and repeated this, and so on, until this volunteer had had that sort of contact with ten different cases of influenza, in different stages of the disease, mostly fresh cases, none of them more than three days old… NONE OF THEM TOOK SICK IN ANY WAY.


“We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was
transmitted from person to person. Perhaps,” concluded Dr. Milton Rosenau, “if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”27

Earlier attempts to demonstrate contagion in horses had met with the same resounding failure. Healthy horses were kept in
close contact with sick ones during all stages of the disease. Nose bags were kept on horses that had nasal discharges and
high temperatures. Those nose bags were used to contain food for other horses which, however, stubbornly remained healthy.



As a result of these and other attempts, Lieutenant Colonel Herbert Watkins-Pitchford of the British Army Veterinary Corps
wrote in July 1917 that he could find no evidence that influenza was ever spread directly from one horse to another.

-------
Great post! I read a CBC (Communist Broadcasting Corporation) article attacking Dr.Cowan as he mentioned the very example you posted. The article claimed that they (CBC) could not find ANY information on the internet to back up Dr. Cowan's claim. I was like, really?? The public broadcaster couldn't find any reference to "The Invisible Rainbow" Wow! Isn't that odd?
 

Maes17

Superstar
Joined
Jul 27, 2017
Messages
6,521
Everything that exists as it is right now in the world, is not a lie that needs to be replaced by something else. Thinking that is the way things are, is not the way to try to discern a narrow road. Just because no one else is on it with you, doesn’t mean it is because you are right about something and everyone else is wrong. You could still be wrong, you will just end up being wrong and alone.
Well I am pretty cautious with this covid thing. I don’t wear a mask and such, but I do think this little booger is real. Is it deadly? Idk.

I got really sick in early February which I think was covid. I had a sinus infection felt in my face for another week after my fever bout.

In late April I developed a sore throat and a burnt out feeling. Like always fatigued. I figured maybe my workout routine along with my job working me like a dog at the time was the case. Feel similar to late april again in that I’m tired and have a sore throat. Symptoms do not escalate beyond that.
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Ritchie From Boston discusses meeting a couple in their 80's that are on the road handing out info about the CV-19 psy-op! He also discusses the Bill and Melinda Gates "Second Wave" BS and their gleeful reaction and more.

 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Israel Defense Ministry Launches COVID-19 Voice Test for Americans
A company formed at the behest of the Israeli Ministry of Defense has begun collecting voice data from Americans to detect COVID-19 symptoms through technology with dubious diagnostic value, but highly profitable applications in law enforcement.

 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
The Corona Constitution — James Corbett on The Filter Podcast
Bush was right: The Constitution really is just a piece of paper. So what does this mean in the age of the corona crisis, as some turn to those pieces of paper to protect the last shreds of their privacy and even their bodily autonomy?

And if constitutional fictions aren’t the solution, what is? Don’t miss this in-depth exploration of the world of 2020 as James Corbett joins Matt Asher on The Filter podcast.
 
Last edited:

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Refuse To Social Distance? New Study Says You May Be A Psychopath!
Are you tired of social distancing? Tired of the lockdowns? Do you find yourself wishing things would just go back to normal like they were in 2019 when we were all just regular debt slaves to the central banks?
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Awesome mask/muzzle episode from Spiro and Dr. Kaufman...more compliance and anti-social conditioning from the cabal. Where they ask the question?
Do Masks Even Work? Can You Be Forced To Wear One? Dr. Kaufman Weighs In
We are beginning to see more and more mask mandates being rolled out, which raises many questions. Does wearing a mask offer protection from the virus? Is wearing a mask for extended periods of time pose any risk to your health? Can the government or employers really make you wear a mask?

 
Last edited:

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
Doctor questions varying CV-19 mortality rates in European countries and the bizarre spike in youth deaths seen only in England. None of it makes sense.
This is so weird that I can’t fathom it: Why did deaths in those aged 15–44 spike during lockdown, but only in England?
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
15,774
I’ve lost all trust in medical research – the financial muscle of Big Pharma has been busy distorting science during the pandemic
Evidence that a cheap, over-the-counter anti-malarial drug costing £7 combats Covid-19 gets trashed. Why? Because the pharmaceutical giants want to sell you a treatment costing nearly £2,000. It’s criminal.

 

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,725
the fact that it is contagious is self evident by a simple observation of a family that all become infected. Who then come into a hospital and the nurse taking care of them also gets infected.
No, it isn't. An entire family likely lives under the same roof, sharing the same living conditions, the same food, and the same environmental surroundings. Only a complete fool would ASSUME that they all must have a virus and that the virus must somehow be contagious without FIRST verifying they weren't all exposed to the same toxins (e.g. poisons in their food, water and/or surroundings, including EMF and microwave radiation).

It would likewise be prudent to investigate the nurse's situation as well for the same issues. Including the situation at the hospital itself.

And that's assuming your hypothetical situation is even an accurate representation of what is actually happening, which is likely not the case. Perhaps you haven't read the CDC's admission that it is extremely rare for someone who is asymptomatic to actually catch or carry this supposed coronavirus, aka the common-cold?

why don’t you find someone to try out that whole film your hospital project to observe this for yourself.
That's already been done. Here is one such video, shared by an extremely brave nurse (Erin Marie Olszewski) at the epicenter of this purported coronavirus outbreak, at Elmhurst hospital in Queens.

NYC Epicenter Nurse Tells All & the Murdering of Patients! A Must Video!

what you miss is balance. With the subject of viruses, there are unknowns, so there is more to know. But new information doesn’t always replace old information entirely. Rather it integrates into it in some way so that we see a clearer picture and we create a stepping stone that enables us to gain more information beyond this.
There's no need to mix lies with the truth, which most certainly is NOT "balanced" and NEVER helps anyone.

be careful that you aren’t calling arrogance faith Too.
You mean like you did when you didn't realize the obvious fact that fear is the product of ignorance/arrogance?

you’re saying this is about spreading the truth, but really you spread biased information that has no balance and basically isolated you to become more or less a sort of cult leader expecting someone to adhere to your vision of what is true without question.
Is that why you are resorting to logical fallacies (in this instance an ad hominem attack) instead of simply providing any factual evidence that COVID-19 has actually been isolated (i.e. isn't something else being called COVID-19) or that it's contagious, or that the method of transmission has been verified?

Or did you miss phrases like this one: "Spread is THOUGHT* to occur through a cough or contact with fluid from the nose of a person infected..."?

*or, in other words, GUESSED

To further assist you and others who are believing and spreading fear of this fabricated "pandemic" instead of turning to our Creator/Master Designer for Answers, the word "cult" refers to the cultural beliefs people espouse, aka their man-made traditions and pre-conceived notions, which make the Commandments of God (based upon common sense and reason) of NO EFFECT.

good luck selling that crap to people who are capable of questioning the things that you avoid asking yourself because it might not allow you to see yourself in the same special way that this biased view enables you to have. Like I said. Arrogance, but call it faith if you will.
Luck is not a factor, and you have it upside down and backwards yet again. Do you know what keeps you from "seeing" this? Could it be you're blinded by your own arrogance? The arrogance is there to hide one's ignorance, including the ignorance of one's own arrogance. That's why the two are inseparably linked, and why they are so dangerous.

If you need proof of how this works in practice, then please consider why you are pretending that faith is somehow arrogant, but belief in allopathic medicine (witchcraft really) is allegedly "balanced". What was actually shared with you is that FEAR (the polar opposite of faith) is the PRODUCT of ignorance/arrogance, NOT faith.

Let's examine your illogic, again to help you and those who might actually be fooled by your own efforts to peddle total nonsense.

If you've been paying any attention whatsoever over the past 40 years to allopathic medicine, you may have noticed the following pattern:

1) a new drug is introduced onto the market by one of the big pharmaceutical companies;
2) commercials are then aired to get the word out to the public that if they're suffering from this or that ailment, they should ask their (witch) doctor about this new, miracle drug (potion/witch's brew);
3) a few months or years later, the commercials about the same drug commence again, only this time the commercials aren't sponsored by the pharmaceutical companies, but instead by attorneys, to get the word out that if you or a loved one have suffered sickness or death as a result of the same said miracle drug, then to call them to be part of a class-action suit; and
4) this cycle repeats itself time and time again, day in and day out, world without end, etc., etc., etc.

Of course this is before considering the lobbying efforts made by the big pharmaceutical companies to get congress to pass legislation to protect them from such suits so they can continue to peddle their POISONS in the form of drugs, chemo-"therapy" (industrial waste really) and vaccines. And let's not leave out the pharmaceutical companies "influence" (read: ownership) of the government regulatory bodies like the FDA, CDC and the WHO.

The stupidity here is literally breathtaking. Out of the irrational fear of human death, people will actually allow others to inject all manner of poisons directly into their bodies, or voluntarily ingest them if told to do so by one of these (witch) doctors, and pay for that "privilege" , without ever questioning the ingredients or asking for a guarantee from the (witch) doctor that the drug won't do more harm than good.

Why would anyone IN THEIR RIGHT MIND, agree to put something into their body without a list of ingredients and a guarantee? Most people won't buy canned goods without a list of ingredients, but don't bat an eye at some concoction loaded up in a syringe or bottle?

here is a balanced article on how viruses still spread by someone who can integrate the knowledge that viruses are not alive in a way that doesn’t cancel out what we can directly observe with our own two eyes.
And what is it exactly that we've observed with our own two eyes please? Has anyone EVER seen a virus? No. Is the article you sent actually "balanced"? No. It is self-contradictory PROPAGANDA, being passed off as "science".

the surge that is coming will be self evident of contagion.
How would you know a surge is coming or that it's contagious? Do you have a crystal ball perhaps?

Or are you merely regurgitating what the professional liars Fauci, Ferguson, Gates, etc. are promoting, to help them perpetuate even more fear, which will ultimately cost even more lives?

Isaiah 3:12 [As for] My people, children [are] their oppressors, and women rule over them. O My people, they which lead thee cause [thee] to err, and lead thee astray, TO THY DESTRUCTION.

You may not realize this, but we are, in actual fact, IMMORTAL spiritual-Beings (Souls) that are temporarily "locked" inside of these human animal bodies. And it is the collective thought energy of each and every one of us that makes the world we see around us.

If we think truth and love, then our words and actions convey truth and love in the physical world. If, on the other hand, we think/believe lies and fear/hatred, then those thoughts/feelings manifest themselves in the physical in the same manner.

There are several possible ways for the latter to happen, including:

1) if people are ignorant enough to allow their fear to get the better of them, and actually make themselves sick by dwelling on the possibility they could become "infected" (psychosomatic);

2) if people are ignorant enough to allow their fear to get the better of them, and agree to be tested for the coronavirus, or vaccinated for the flu and/or the coronavirus (or anything else for that matter); and

3) if the governments of the world are allowed to proceed with their planned rollout of 5G, which will bathe the Earth's atmosphere in an unprecedented level of the microwave radiation, known to be detrimental to all living things

Unless you deluded yourself into thinking that there are a massive amount of crisis actors available to accomplish what already exists.
There you go again with more logical fallacies (i.e. ILLOGIC). Nobody said anything about crisis actors until you brought that strawman argument up so you (your ego/"self" really) could beat it down.

even saying that this is not contagious is so absolutely delusional at this point, it is truly not worth trying to have another discussion with you on the subject.

These discussions can only help those with an open mind and a love for the truth, which always wins over the lies. And on the subject of lies, let's look at the self-contradictory nonsense in the article you shared, and why the article is proof of absolutely nothing.

"According to Microbe World, a virus is a bundle of genetic material coated within a protein shell known as the capsid. Microbe World relates that virus microbes can be as much as 10,000 times smaller than bacteria and the material inside of the shell consists of either RNA or DNA.

Dr. Ananya Mandal claims for News Medical that a virus is not considered alive on its own. Outside of its host cell, it is inert, and it needs the host cell of either a plant or animal to reproduce. The virus accomplishes this by either fooling the host cell into pulling it inside or by fusing itself to the exterior wall of the cell, where it takes over and destroys the cell's normal functions."


-------

Note: Has this process of a FOREIGN virus invading a host cell ever been witnessed? NO. It's only been ASSUMED. And the one and only reason for this assumption is to facilitate the use of drugs, which would be completely unmarketable otherwise.

And how would something that is admittedly NOT alive, and is admittedly INERT outside its host cell, and is admittedly INCAPABLE OF REPRODUCING outside its own host cell, manage to "fool" or "fuse itself to the exterior wall of" a FOREIGN cell? Does it put on a disguise perhaps? Or possess magical zombie-like superpowers we've yet to discover?

Is it not obvious and logical that the virus is actually a specifically programmed response of its host cell to rid itself of dead or decaying matter/tissue within itself (the host cell) ONLY?

IF it were possible for such an INERT virus to alter its own programming outside its host cell, and actually begin destroying healthy matter, what would stop it from attacking other cells within the host body once it's ejected from its host cell?

Is it not equally obvious that IF a virus, which isn't alive and cannot reproduce outside its own host cell, could actually invade a foreign cell and destroy healthy matter, the very first virus on planet Earth would have been the last, wiping out ALL living tissue, i.e. anything that contained healthy matter?

This is how ludicrous and totally illogical the "germ theory" ASSUMPTION that western, allopathic medicine is based upon, really is.

-------

"According to Microbe World, virus particles exist almost everywhere in the environment. There are many ways that a virus gains entry into its host, including through contact with other infected individuals, breaks in the skin and inhalation. For example, News Medical states that cold and flu viruses seek out cells that line the respiratory tract. Then, once the assembly of the new virus particles is complete, the infected cells die, releasing new virus microbes to go on to repeat the process."

-------

Note: This is total, unbelievable nonsense. How could inert virus particles exist anywhere for any period of time without breaking down as ALL dead and decaying matter does on planet Earth?

Where is the evidence in support of anything "Microbe World" or "News Medical" says? Why do they offer no case studies, photographs or empirical data of any kind? BECAUSE THESE ARE UNPROVEN ASSUMPTIONS.

And what would stop this never-ending process they describe? The end of any healthy tissue to serve as fuel for the alleged virus microbe fire?

Are you perhaps starting to see how untenable these big pharma, allopathic viral assumptions really are?
 
Last edited:

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,725
Great post! I read a CBC (Communist Broadcasting Corporation) article attacking Dr.Cowan as he mentioned the very example you posted. The article claimed that they (CBC) could not find ANY information on the internet to back up Dr. Cowan's claim. I was like, really?? The public broadcaster couldn't find any reference to "The Invisible Rainbow" Wow! Isn't that odd?
They have to do everything possible to suppress this information, because it destroys the absurd, egotistical notion that we are all a threat to each other, while at the same time hiding masking the real culprits (pun intended). One would think the same, tired old divide and conquer and diversionary tactics would be self-evident at this point.
 
Top