KoncreteMind
Star
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 2,342
Ad hominem: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.TROLL.
Ad hominem: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.TROLL.
Hey Elsbet...Are we referring to YHVH?
*waves* Hi, KM...
TROLL.Ad hominem: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.
No. That would be whatever god you worship named "hovah". Trolls usually bring ruin/disaster/mischief not the facts I did that you couldnt answerTROLL.
Yes... the tetragrammaton. I know we sometimes add vowels that could be less than accurate. :/Hey Elsbet...
Im not sure of your question (no trolling ).. Are you asking if Im referring to the tetragammon "YHVH"?
When there really is nothing more to say to someone i will from now on just reply TROLL.No. That would be whatever god you worship named "hovah". Trolls usually bring ruin/disaster/mischief not the facts I did that you couldnt answer
You must have met some very odd Christians! I split my reading (actually mainly listening) between the Old and New. The connections between the two are amazing. Nowhere in the OT (apart from the made up book 2 Esdras - thanks btw @bible_student !) does it point specifically to Jesus.[sarcasm]What a way to support your position [/sarcasm]
Unlike your fictitious belief that a man can pay/die for your soul, that doesnt fly in regards to what is written in the law and the prophets. And no, Mark, John,Peter, James, Paul, Jude etc... were not prophets in any sense of the word.
Anyways, your avoidance and this thread in general goes along with what I already said in this thread. Christianity for the most part only considers the OT when it benefits their belief system. When it doesnt (such as here specifically God saying what Moses was to tell the Israelites His name was/is) its irrelevant/done away with/ignored. Typical...
It has been while since I looked into it but wasn’t the Tetragrammaton something they used because they didn’t want the Name written or said?Yes... the tetragrammaton. I know we sometimes add vowels that could be less than accurate. :/
You’re the only one trolling here. You said the name was hovah I said it meant mischief/ruin/disaster based on what the strongs says. Here it is again:When there really is nothing more to say to someone i will from now on just reply TROLL.
You’re the only one trolling here. You said the name was hovah I said it meant mischief/ruin/disaster based on what the strongs says. Here it is again:
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1943
When you couldn’t answer that you started throwing out ad hominems. Which is cool because at this point I’m just seeing how long you’ll go avoiding that which is right in front of you and everyone who can look it up lol
I think, properly understood, Islam is a polemic against Judaism and Christianity.So busy throwing rocks on our third floor window with speculation about history or prayer directions that are a degree off ,meanwhile. your foundation needs to be fixed. God is Al-Ahad!
It corrects those who are against the unity of the Creator no matter what faith they are.I think, properly understood, Islam is a polemic against Judaism and Christianity.
I'm sorry but the Devil has deceived you.So busy throwing rocks on our third floor window with speculation about history or prayer directions that are a degree off ,meanwhile. your foundation needs to be fixed. God is Al-Ahad!
I'm not sure, tbh. I know the Hebrew doesn't employ vowels, so often Jehovah is used to complete the unknown.It has been while since I looked into it but wasn’t the Tetragrammaton something they used because they didn’t want the Name written or said?
But I was really referencing the Hebrew word for “I am” which is not “hovah” like Token said. In my opinion that is the closest we can get to understanding what His Name is though I don’t think the Hebrew we see today is exactly like the Hebrew from those times.
Yes this is where we started to which I replied the strongs says that "hovah" means ruin/disaster/mischief. Do you think the Creator's name would be associated with disaster/mischief/ruin OR is strongs right about the "name" but wrong about hovah meaning "mischief" OR should we just go by what the Creator (if we believe Moses that is) said His Name is in Exodus 3?Exodus 6 2"And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD:
3And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them."
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/3068.htm
The problem I see is that according to christians, Jesus was planned to come and do what he is said to have done since the beginning. Yet, there is no direct mention of him in the OT. And alot of the "prophecies" that are supposedly speaking of him, are taken terribly out of context. It goes from the OT saying no one can die for another sins, to another dying for everyone's sins. It goes from the law being eternal, to the law being abolished/done away with/nailed to the cross. All while the Creator who said the former things, said He never changes.. It hasnt always been this way, but I dont buy it anymore.You must have met some very odd Christians! I split my reading (actually mainly listening) between the Old and New. The connections between the two are amazing. Nowhere in the OT (apart from the made up book 2 Esdras - thanks btw @bible_student !) does it point specifically to Jesus.
*Its authorship is ascribed to Ezra, a scribe and priest of the 5th century BC, although modern scholarsip places its composition between 70 and 218 AD:
2 Esdras 7
"28 For my son Jesus shall be revealed with those that be with him, and they that remain shall rejoice within four hundred years."
The OT veils the coming Messiah, yet hints in hundreds of ways. If you don't like that approach you will not see what Jesus explained to the two disciples walking on the road to Emmaus:-